# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 53.1 |
| Rank | 342 | 37 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1413 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 153.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.7 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.