# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Grok 4.5

> Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-grok-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.5 leads 65.8 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 55.0 |
| Rank | 342 | 25 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1474 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1553 |
| SciCode | — | 54.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 46.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1462 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 153.92 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 36% |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1288 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1446 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1442 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.5 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.