# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 46.2 |
| Rank | 342 | 65 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1457 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1442 |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1431 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1452 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.