# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 38.7.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 342 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1149 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1138 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1159 |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.