# Dolly 2.0-12b vs GLM-5.3

> GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-glm-5-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.9 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 54.6 |
| Rank | 339 | 25 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- GLM-5.3: 59.0 (#12)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1499 |
| DeepSWE | — | 69% |
| FrontierCode | — | 40.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1623 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 30.2% |
| SciCode | — | 59% |
| WeirdML | — | 75.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,317 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-5.3: 36.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 8,164 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- GLM-5.3: 45.2 (#42)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1491 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | 155.56 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.2% |
| CritPt | — | 19.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 33% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| LMCA | — | 55.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- GLM-5.3: 62.1 (#27)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1493 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 49% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1512 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- GLM-5.3: 55.9 (#27)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1523 |
| LMArena French | — | 1499 |
| LMArena German | — | 1505 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1460 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- GLM-5.3: 77.8 (#15)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1481 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-5.3: 45.5 (#32)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1485 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- GLM-5.3: 75.9 (#6)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1473 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1473 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2075 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.0 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GLM-5.3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 41.