# Dolly 2.0-12b vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 342 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1368 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1371 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1340 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GLM-4.6V share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.