# Dolly 2.0-12b vs GLM-4.5

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-glm-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5 leads 57.5 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 342 | 122 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1429 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1427 |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1433 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1412 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1395 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1415 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1343 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GLM-4.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.