# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.3 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 339 | 203 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1269 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1310 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1277 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.