# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 2 27B

> Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 2 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.4 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 339 | 302 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1199 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | 122.06 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1212 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 26.2% | 75.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1172 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | — | 1246 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1231 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 2 27B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.