# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 43.5 to 34.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Thematic Generalization: 57.1% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 41.6% for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 96 | 185 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 16.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1350 |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Trinity Large Thinking share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.