# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Seed 2.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#96); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 96 | — |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Seed 2.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#96); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.