# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 43.5 to 36.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 96 | 232 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.