# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 96 | 72 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1460 |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.