# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Pixtral Large

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-pixtral-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 32.9.
- Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 31.7 |
| Rank | 97 | 257 |
| Context | 256K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | 1089 |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Pixtral Large?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Pixtral Large?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Pixtral Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.