# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Phi-4

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 40.7.
- Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 97 | 269 |
| Context | 256K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.43 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1211 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1223 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Phi-4?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Phi-4 better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Phi-4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.