# Seed 2.0 Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.6 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 97 | 306 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.