# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Nemo

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 97 | 332 |
| Context | 256K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Nemo?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.