# Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 24.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 96 | 49 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1512 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.