# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Mercury

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-mercury
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 46.2.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 96 | 199 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1285 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Mercury: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1266 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1282 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Mercury?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Mercury better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.