# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Llama 13b

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 96 | 348 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 728 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Llama 13b?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Llama 13b better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.