# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Inkling in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.6 to 23.1.
- Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 66K.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 97 | 75 |
| Context | 256K | 66K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $4.68 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1463 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1412 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1452 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.6 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1482 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1468 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Inkling: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1453 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1442 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1427 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1436 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1390 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Seed 2.0 Pro costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Inkling?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Inkling better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Inkling share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.