# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Hy3 in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.6 to 42.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 41.2% for Hy3.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 97 | 79 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.13 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $0.53 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1465 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 41.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1449 |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1475 |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1461 |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | 1390 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1443 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1399 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1436 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Hy3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.