# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Grok 3

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 3 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 24.1 to 13.7.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 96 | 157 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1434 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.33 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1391 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 55.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Grok 3: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1387 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Grok 3?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Grok 3 better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.