# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2B

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Google |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 97 | 305 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 989 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1442 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 971 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2B?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.