# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 3 Pro

> Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3 Pro in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Pro leads 52.5 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 94.4% for Gemini 3 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 54.8 |
| Rank | 96 | 28 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 51.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1481 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1440 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.7% |
| GSO | — | 18.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 69.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,177 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 3 Pro: 40.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 69.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.5% |
| GDPval | — | 40.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 1.3% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 80.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 18% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 75.9% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 91% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 46.3% |
| BALROG | — | 58.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1207 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 71% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,478 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 52.5 (#31)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 94.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1480 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 31.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 76.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 80.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 75% |
| CritPt | — | 6.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 31% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.2% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 152.92 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.2 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 49.9 (#59)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1476 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.4% |
| ProofBench | — | 20% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 55.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 37.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 18.8% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 64.4 (#16)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1475 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 37.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 90.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 13.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 57.6 (#2)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1305 |
| GeoBench | — | 84% |
| VPCT | — | 91% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1434 |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 56.9 (#16)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1523 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1492 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1515 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1510 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1448 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1493 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 76.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1458 |
| IFEval | — | 87.7% |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 44.0 (#79)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1471 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.8% |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Gemini 3 Pro: 66.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1482 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1484 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1525 |
| WildBench | — | 85.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 3 Pro?

Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 3 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 3 Pro share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3 Pro has 67.