# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview

> Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-3-flash-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3 Flash Preview in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 83.1% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Both cost about the same: $0.50 input and $3 output per million tokens.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 52.3 |
| Rank | 96 | 40 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1460 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 75.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1439 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 72.7% |
| GSO | — | 9.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 61.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,367 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 64.3% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 27.3% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 76.8% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 91.2% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 49.8% |
| BALROG | — | 48.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 10% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1198 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,635 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1465 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 33.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| DTBench | — | 89.1% |
| LMCA | — | 43.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.8 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.5 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 51.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 15% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 35.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1462 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 66.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 13.5% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1285 |
| GeoBench | — | 88% |
| VPCT | — | 72.6% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1413 |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1458 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1477 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1497 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1489 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1480 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1469 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1437 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1452 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1466 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1457 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1471 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 3 Flash Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash Preview share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59.