# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

> Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-3-8-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 3.8 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 76.9 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 28.4% for Seed 2.0 Pro and 97.4% for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 61.8 |
| Rank | 96 | 11 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.75 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $3.75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.2 (#15)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1510 |
| DeepSWE | — | 73.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 41.2% |
| CursorBench | — | 39.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1584 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 19.6% |
| SciCode | — | 56.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 84.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,270 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Seed 2.0 Pro: —
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.8 (#21)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 64.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 5.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,094 |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.9 (#5)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | 97.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1508 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 89.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 18.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 61% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 47% |
| DTBench | — | 95.7% |
| LMCA | — | 52.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 76.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.71 |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3 (#28)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1528 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 68.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 22% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 48% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.8 (#2)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1524 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 95.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.7% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.7 (#45)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1314 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 38.6% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 31.7% |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 58.0 (#5)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1491 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1554 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1498 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1493 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1502 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1515 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1485 |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.0 (#13)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.3 (#24)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1508 |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2 (#15)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1499 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1492 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1501 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1748 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.8 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 3.8 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.2 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 3.8 Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.8 Flash has 50.