# Seed 2.0 Pro vs Falcon-180B

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dola-seed-2-0-pro-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 96 | 260 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |

## Reasoning

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1007 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multimodal

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |

## Multilingual

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1013 |

## FAQ

### Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Falcon-180B?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Falcon-180B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.