# Devstral Small 2505 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/devstral-small-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Devstral Small 2505 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505 and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.30 for Devstral Small 2505.
- Devstral Small 2505 accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 228 | 203 |
| Context | 128K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Devstral Small 2505: 38.6 (#160)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 56.4% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1269 |

## Reasoning

- Devstral Small 2505: 19.1 (#243)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.7% | 31.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1284 |

## Math

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1310 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1277 |

## Writing & Preference

- Devstral Small 2505: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Devstral Small 2505 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is Devstral Small 2505 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Devstral Small 2505 lists at $0.10 and $0.30.

### Is Devstral Small 2505 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Devstral Small 2505 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Devstral Small 2505 does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Devstral Small 2505 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Devstral Small 2505 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.