# DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B

> DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 64.8 to 16.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1.98 for DeepSeek V4 Pro.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 54.3 | 28.1 |
| Rank | 31 | 326 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $1.98 | $0.08 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | 1230 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 51% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58)
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24)
- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1253 |
| DTBench | 93.9% | 50.9% |
| LMCA | 45.5% | 2.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.31 | 116.02 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30)
- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1239 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | 23.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | 6.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1464 | 1223 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47)
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | 1239 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51)
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1458 | 1273 |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46)
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1271 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1255 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro lists at $0.66 and $1.98.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 3 4B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.