# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Wizardlm 13b

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 18.5.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 32 | 272 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1035 |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 41.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.51 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1438 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.