# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 32.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Mystery Game Puzzles: 34% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 17% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 35 | 106 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | 621.92 |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | 17% |
| DTBench | 90.9% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 41.7% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | 146.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1439 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.5 Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.