# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3 14B

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 18.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 33% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 4% for Qwen3 14B.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 35 | 225 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 49.9% | 31.6% |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | 49.1% |
| CritPt | 16.6% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | 4% |
| DTBench | 90.9% | 64% |
| LMCA | 41.7% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | 66.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | 63.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1439 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen3 14B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3 14B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3 14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.