# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 26.4.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 35 | 168 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1347 |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 41.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1439 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.