# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma 7B

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 63.8 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 35 | 299 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1048 |
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | 111.99 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 41.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1066 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | 1001 |
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1439 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemma 7B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemma 7B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.