# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 91% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 35 | 173 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.49 | 135.06 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | 65.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1439 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.