# DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Falcon-180B

> DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 18.3.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 53.6 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 32 | 254 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 63% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,306 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25)
- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.51 | 111.89 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89% | — |
| CritPt | 16.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 33% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 41.7% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 56% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1441 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71)
- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena French | 1438 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1437 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76)
- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1421 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59)
- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1013 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Falcon-180B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Falcon-180B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.