# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 25.4.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 40 | 168 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | 1346 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1493 | 1305 |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1328 |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.