# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ministral 3B

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-ministral-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 57.9 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 52.8 | 26.2 |
| Rank | 38 | 338 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1619 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1506 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 39.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 19.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36)
- Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 89.9% | 51.7% |
| LMCA | 47% | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.9 | 118.1 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25)
- Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 67.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38)
- Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 34.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1497 | — |
| LMArena French | 1452 | — |
| LMArena German | 1484 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1459 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1474 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1457 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Ministral 3B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ministral 3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.