# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 2B

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 65.8 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 40 | 305 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | 1010 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 989 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | 93.57 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1493 | 1009 |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 971 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 945 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 2B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 2B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 2B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.