# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 65.8 to 36.6.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 32.5 |
| Rank | 40 | 244 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1113 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1493 | 1135 |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1096 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1156 |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | 1140 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1118 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1118 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.