# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 21.6.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 40 | 171 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | 135.06 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1493 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.