# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 48.4 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 89.9% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 40 | 327 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1511 | 1108 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1620 | — |
| SciCode | 51.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,092 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.01 | 116.97 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | 14.3% | — |
| LMCA | 47% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 46.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1493 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1059 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| MMLU | — | 70% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1506 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1144 |
| LMArena Russian | 1473 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1499 | 1118 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1114 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1130 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1139 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1540 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.