# DeepSeek-V3 vs QwQ-32B

> DeepSeek-V3 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 35

## Summary

- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3 scores higher in 5 categories and QwQ-32B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 34.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 55.1% for DeepSeek-V3 and 20.9% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 157 | 153 |
| Context | 164K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.24 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.90 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3: 41.9 (#99)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 50% | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 70.9% | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1368 | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 62.2% | 54.4% |
| SciCode | 35.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 36.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek-V3: —
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 49.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3: 20.0 (#226)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 65.8% | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1365 | 1326 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 60.9% | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.95 | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | 59.1 | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 72% |
| SimpleBench | 27.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | 64.8% | — |
| LMCA | 15.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 87.5% | — |
| HellaSwag | 88.9% | — |
| PIQA | 84.7% | — |
| WinoGrande | 85.2% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3: 30.4 (#208)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 37.8% | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 73.5% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1359 |
| Omni-MATH | 40.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 75.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#147)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 67.6% | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | 26.1% | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1352 | 1323 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 95.3% | — |
| MMLU | 87.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3: 48.8 (#138)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1358 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1390 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1386 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1374 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1333 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1321 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1372 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1358 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3: 73.0 (#125)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1345 | 1297 |
| IFEval | 83.2% | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#248)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3: 57.6 (#124)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1375 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1364 | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77% | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1472 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | 49.1% | 51.4% |
| WildBench | 83% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3 better than QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek-V3 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DeepSeek-V3 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3 and QwQ-32B share?

35 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3 has 60 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.