# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Yi-Large

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has enough public results to be ranked (#159); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-yi-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 39.9 to 36.1.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 159 | — |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)
- Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 47.2% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Yi-Large?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has enough public results to be ranked (#159); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Yi-Large better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.