# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Step 3.7 Flash

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 20.9.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 159 | 207 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Step 3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.9 vs 39.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.