# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 28.2.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 162 | 156 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.