# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 25.9.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 162 | 181 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.