# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Phi-2

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has enough public results to be ranked (#162); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-phi-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | — |
| Rank | 162 | — |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.94 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222)
- Phi-2: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Phi-2?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has enough public results to be ranked (#162); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Phi-2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.