# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 46.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 159 | 102 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1444 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.